Empowerment of Learning and Effective Factors Using Modern Education Technology for Rural Society, Multiple Managerial Decision-Making, Network Analysis with Fuzzy Dimetal Approach
Subject Areas : General
Mohammad Sadiq Mahdavi Khorrami
1
,
Mohammad Ali Karamati
2
*
,
Nayereh Shahmohammadi
3
1 - PhD student in Technology Management, Technology Transfer Management, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 - Supervisor, Associate Professor, Department of Technology Management, Islamic Azad University Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 - Associate Professor and academic Staff of Organization for Educational Research and Planning. Tehran, Iran
Keywords: Fuzzy Dimetal method, formal and technical professional training, new educational technology, effective factors,
Abstract :
With the decrease in the rural population rate, educational services in the rural community in our country are facing serious challenges. The number of students in some rural primary schools does not reach the quorum. Also, technical skill in other levels of education has caused a decrease in productivity in the production of agriculture, industry and construction, mining and rural economy services. One of the ways out is to create an education network. The new education in the rural community is based on the opinion of experts. The statistical community and its attribute is based on the number of rural households in the country, which was scored using Cochran's method. 53 statistical samples were scored for the reliability and validity of the questions with the opinion of experts. It was weighted and prioritized. The findings of the research show that: the most important factors in the main criterion are environmental factors in order of first priority and sub-criteria "proper infrastructure in the rural community and household income, continuation of education support costs" In the 1st and 2nd ranks, "flexibility in time and place" is in the 4th rank. Also, in the sociological factors - its sub-criterion, "computer literacy and correct use of computers" is the third priority. "Library, banner and poster, the content of textbook concepts and instant access to information on the network" in priorities 5, 6 and 7 are the best effective factors of empowering modern education technology in rural society.
1. .نوایی، زهرا، امیدواری، منوچهر: ارزیابی ریسک بوسیله روش ویلیام فاین با استفاده از تلفیق روش های تصمیم گیری تحلیل شبکه ای و دیمتل فازی. کنفرانس مدیریت و مهندسی صنایع، 1394.
2 . ابراهیمی، الهام، قلی پور و همکاران: رویکردی کمی به منظور تحلیل و سنجش ریسک های منابع انسانی، نشریه مدیریت فرهنگ سازمانی دوره 15 شماره ، 1395.
3 .کمال زارع، امیر، وهمکاران : تعیین عوامل موثر در ارزیابی اثربخشی دوره های آموزشی کارکنان بوسیله ی روش دیمتل فازی. کنفرانس بین المللی پژوهش در علوم و تکنولوژی دوره0 شماره 3، 1395.
4. معطوفی، علیرضا: بررسی روابط درونی عوامل مؤثر بر بازاریابی کارآفرین در تعاونی های کشاورزی با استفاده از روش دیمتل فازی. نشریه تعاون و کشاورزی دوره7، شماره 25، 1397.
5. امیربیک، محمدامین و همکاران: اشتغال بخش کشاورزی از طریق رفع موانع عرضه ی محصولات کشاورزی به بورس کالا مورد مطالعه استان خراسان رضوی، نشریه راهبردی های کار آفرین کشاورزی دوره6 شماره12، 1398.
6. صمدی میرکلایی، حسین، صمدی میان کلایی، حمزه: تبیین الگوی دانشگاه کارآفرین ازطریق رهیافت مدل سازی ساختاری تفسیری مبتنی بر دیمتل فازی . نشریه مجلس و راهبرد دوره27 شماره 101، 1399.
7. فکورثقیه، امیرمحمد، حاج مندی، نرگس: ارائه مدل مفهومی توسعه گردشگری الکترونیک ایران با استفاده از دیمتل فازی.نشریه مهندسی و مدیریت کیفیت دوره9 شماره 1،1399.
8. Jacobus G. Maree, Fletcher, L., Erasmus, P: The Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence, Study Orientation in Mathematics and the Mathematics Achievement of the Middle Adolescent, Journal of Psychology in Africa, 23(2): 205-211, DOI: 1080/10/2013/14330237.10820616,2013.
9. Gasco, J, Villarroel,J. D & Goñi, A: Differences in the Use of Learning Strategies in Mathematics in 8th and 9th grade. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1040- 1043.2014.
10.Kosir, K, Tement, S: Teacher–student relationship and academic achievement: a cross-lagged longitudinal study on three different age groups. Eur J Psychol Educ, 29, 409–428,2014.
11. Barrett, Peter, Davies, Fay, Zhang, Yufan, Barrett, Lucinda: The impact of classroom design on pupils' learning: Final results of a holistic, multi-level analysis. Building and Environment, 89, 118–133. doi: 1016/10/j.buildenv.02/2015.013,2015.
12. Chen, B. H, Chiu, W. C, & Wang, C. C: The relationship among academic selfconcept, learning strategies, and academic achievement: A case study of national vocational college students in Taiwan via SEM. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(2): 419-431,2015.
13.Entremont, Y: Linking Mathematics, Culture and Community.Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174(2): 2818–2824,2015.
14.Maxwell, Sophie, Reynolds, K, Lee, E, Subasic, E, Bromhead, D: The Impact of School Climate and School Identification on Academic Achievement: Multilevel Modeling with Student and Teacher Data. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(2), 2069–2101. doi:3389/10/fpsyg.02069/2017,2017.
15.Clivaz, S, Miyakawa, T: The effects of culture on mathematics lessons: an international comparative study of a collaboratively designed lesson. Educ Stud Math 105, 53–70,2020.
16.Jang, Selim, Hyde, Daniel C: Hemispheric asymmetries in processing numerical meaning in arithmetic. Neuropsychologia, 146(2): 10-52,2020.