Benchmarking of Innovation Support : Trend Development Study on the Projects of Laureates of Khwarizmi International Prize (KIP)
Subject Areas : Generalhoma ghaed sharafi 1 * , ghasem ramezanpour 2
1 -
2 -
Keywords:
Abstract :
The present survey investigates the trend development of research projects of laureates of Khwarizmi International Prize (KIP), with an overview of EU & OECD policies for innovation support is studied. The type of this study is descriptive by using questionnaire for data collection and/or personal interview by this performer with the performer of the prize winner's project. The data analyzed in this survey are based on responses received from the laureates who are sent the questionnaires inquiring the condition of their research project. The data analyzed were from 70 questionnaires and the qualitative data analysis method is used for description. Analysis of data suggests that 97% of the laureates are male, 57% of the laureates are engineers or university graduates at M.Eng. level. 27% of them have completed their graduate degree in Electronic and Electrical Engineering; 31% of executive organizations are universities and 31.8% of the laureates have completed their studies at Sharif Industrial University; 71% of the organizations are public; and 50% of the projects are at industrial stage. It was found that 52% of problems were financial. "Lack of protection" is the most significant challenges to laureates (53%). At the Industrial stage, 50% of the projects at the highest level need financial support. The European ::union:: (EU) has adopted a system approach based on innovation policy and provides direct financial and services support for innovators. The innovation policy aims to support an increase in the productivity, profitability and market share of European firms through the development and adoption of new or improved products, processes and services. Moreover, the EU intends to improve innovation support and also helps in understanding specific drives and barriers to innovation at sector level. In OECD countries, public policy has direct or indirect impact on factors that affect innovative activity. All OECD countries use significant amounts of public money to support innovation activities that intend to stimulate innovation. It is a long time since in almost all countries the general idea of IP policy has been directed to greater protection for the rights of IP holders, especially for patents. Indeed, the availability of sufficient human resources for science and technology is an important factor for innovative activities. Education and training policies have an important impact on innovation.
سازمان پژوهش‌هاي علمي و صنعتي ايران)، بولتن طرح‌هاي برگزيده 30 دوره جشنواره بين‌المللي خوارزمي از 1366 تا 1395.- تهران: سازمان پژوهش‌هاي علمي و صنعتي ايران.
سازمان پژوهش‌هاي علمي و صنعتي ايران، ويژه نامه بيست و پنج سال برگزاري جشنواره بين‌المللي خوارزمي، تهيه و تدوين آذر اورنگيان.- تهران: سازمان پژوهش‌هاي علمي و صنعتي ايران،1390،192ص.
شوراي فرهنگستان زبان و ادب فارسي، اصول و ضوابط واژه‌گزيني همراه با شرح و توضيحات.- تهران: فرهنگستان، 1376.
قائدشرفي، هما، بررسي فرايند انتخاب طرح‌هاي جشنواره بين‌المللي خوارزمي، گزارش طرح پژوهشي.- تهران: سازمان پژوهش‌هاي علمي و صنعتي ايران، 1389، 216ص.
قائدشرفي، هما، بررسي وضعيت روند توسعه طرح‌های جايزه بين‌ا‌لمللی خوارزمی پس از برنده شدن در 15 دوره گذشته، گزارش طرح پژوهشي.- تهران: سازمان پژوهش‌هاي علمي و صنعتي ايران، 1392، 148ص.
OECD, The Global Competition for Talent: Mobility of the Highly Skilled, OECD, 2008, p.165.
European Union, Lessons from a Decade of Innovation Policy: What can be learnt from the INNO Policy Trend Chart and The Innovation Union Scoreboard, European Union, 2013, p.100.
Aghion, P., N. Bloom, R. Blundell, R. Griffith and P. Howitt, Competition and Innovation: an Inverted U Relationship, NBER Working Paper No. 9269, 2002.
Department for business Innovation & Skills, Funding for EU research and innovation from 2014: a UK perspective, May.#Dodgson, Mark & Hughes, Alan & Foster, John & Metcalfe, Stan. Systems thinking, market failure, and the development of innovation policy: The case of Australia, Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(9), 2011, pages 1145-1156.
European Commission, Overview of EU support for innovation, EU Publishing, 2005.
European Commission Staff Working Document, Making public support for innovation in the EU more effective: Lessons from a public consultation for action at Community level, Sec 1197, 2009.
European Commission Staff Working Document, Challenges for EU support to innovation in services: Fostering new markets and jobs through innovation, Sec 1195, 2009.
European Commission, Innovation Union Scoreboard. IUS 2014 dashboard
Graziano Pini, Governance of Tech Transfer: Recent Experiences in Some Developed Regions of Europe, Transition Studies Review, Springer, 16(4), 2010, pp 872-883, February.
Greenhalgh, C., M. Longland and D. Bosworth, Trends and Distribution of Intellectual Property: UK and European Patents and UK Trade and Service Marks 1986-2000, Report for Intellectual Property and Innovation Directorate, UK Patent Office, 2003.
Jaumotte, Florence (2005), An Overview of Public Policies to Support Innovation, OECD Publishing, 2005.
Masters, William A. and Benoit Delbecq, Accelerating Innovation With prize rewards, Purdu University (USA): IFPRI, 2008.
OECD Science, Competition Policy and Innovation, Technology and Industry Working Papers, No.11, 2002.
Shapiro, C., Competition Policy and Innovation, STI Working Paper 2002/11, OECD, 2002.
http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/ innovation/policy/innovation-scoreboard/ index_en.htm
http://www.lindberghfoundation.org/docs