This article was done with the aim of providing a model for the development of entrepreneurship in the university and more communication between the industry and the university. In terms of purpose, this research is applied-development and its method is mixed (qualitati
More
This article was done with the aim of providing a model for the development of entrepreneurship in the university and more communication between the industry and the university. In terms of purpose, this research is applied-development and its method is mixed (qualitative-quantitative). In this research, in the qualitative part, it is based on an interpretive paradigm and a foundational data method (grand theory). Among the different approaches of theorizing the foundation, the systematic approach of Strauss and Corbin was used based on the needs and research process. In the coding steps section, it was done in three steps. Then all these titles were listed in a table.In the quantitative part, 384 questionnaires were randomly distributed among the statistical sample. To determine the validity of the questionnaire in the qualitative part of the review technique of the researcher members, the version of the codes and the research model was provided to a number of professors, and the reliability of the questionnaire using Cronbach's alpha method was /70. Obtained. The results were surveyed on the factors and indicators related to the development of entrepreneurship in the university. For this purpose, structural equation method and SPSS and Smar PLS software were used to check the fit of the research model with the collected data.The main findings of the research are: managerial factors, facilities and human resources as causal conditions, infrastructural, environmental, motivational and informational factors as background conditions, investment, cultural and support factors as intervening conditions, competitive factors of laws Support, training and reward and promotion were considered as solutions and strategies, and skill factors, production style and knowledge, technology and innovation were considered as consequences
Manuscript profile
